Corporate Governance
Fit and Proper Policy
1. INTRODUCTION
icapital.biz Berhad (“ICAP” or the “Company”)’s Directors’ Fit and Proper Policy (the “Policy”) sets out the fit and proper criteria to ensure the Company has put in place a formal and transparent process for the appointment and re-election of directors of the Company.In formulating this policy, the Company is obliged to comply with the requirements contained in the Main Market Listing Requirements (“MMLR”) of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad and other applicable rules and regulations.
2. OBJECTIVE
The Policy aims at guiding the Nomination Committee and Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in their review and assessment of candidates who are to be appointed to the Board as well as directors who are seeking re-election in complying with the new para 15.01A of MMLR.The Policy ensures that each of the directors of the Company possesses the requisite character, experience, qualification, integrity and competence and time to effectively discharge his/her role as director of the Company.
3. FIT AND PROPER CRITERIA
The fit and proper criteria of directors of the Company include but are not limited to the following:
3.1 Character and integrity:
a. Probity
b. Personal integrity
c.Financial integrity
d. Reputation
3.2 Experience and competence
a. Qualifications, training and skills
b. Relevant experience and expertise
c. Relevant past performance or track record
3.3 Time and commitment
a. Ability to discharge role having regard to other commitments
b. Participation and contribution to the board or track record
4. FIT AND PROPER POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
4.1 The Board and the Nominating Committee shall be directly responsible for conducting assessments on the fitness and propriety of directors of the Company and making decisions on their appointments and re-appointments.
4.2 The Nominating Committee will assess each candidate for the new appointments or re-appointments based on the criteria as stated in Clause 3 of the Policy.
4.3 The fit and proper assessments on each director of the Company within the scope of this Policy shall be conducted by the Company both prior to initial appointments and at regular intervals of at least annually or whenever the Company becomes aware of information that may materially compromise a director’s fitness and propriety.
4.4 The specifications required for the position and other relevant considerations for the position are required to be periodically assessed and reviewed by the Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors to ensure their relevance and alignment with the Company’s nature of business as a closed-end fund.
4.5 The Company will consider the factors set out in Clause 3 above in assessing a director’s fitness and propriety. The factors shall be assessed individually, as well as collectively, considering their relative importance. Failure to meet one factor on its own does not necessarily mean failure to meet the fit and proper criteria. The Company will consider the specific circumstances surrounding a director’s failure to meet specific factors, such as the lapse of time since the occurrence of events, other contributing factors and the significance of the event from the perspective of potential risks posed to the Company.
4.6 The Board should monitor and ensure ongoing compliance of the Policy with other policies and procedures such as Board Charter and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors.
4.7 The necessary actions should be taken when a director of the Company is assessed to be no longer fit and proper for a specific reason.
5. REVIEW
This Policy shall be reviewed periodically by the Board and be revised at any time as it may deem necessary in accordance with the needs of the Company, the MMLR and/or any other applicable laws enforced at the time being.
Adopted by Board: 1 July 2022